As the world continued to grapple with changing suggestions and restrictions surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, rumors continued into late summertime 2020 concerning clinical understanding behind the efficiency of particular face coverings used to decrease COVID-19 transmission. In August, a variety of news publications reported findings from Duke University research study and declared wearing “neck gaiters”– stretchy, thin short articles of clothing used around the neck to sometimes cover the face– can be even worse for transmission than foregoing a mask completely.
Our research discovered this claim to be false and mainly misreported by some media outlets.
Throughout the course of their research study, scientists set out to figure out the best techniques for testing how to assess 14 types of face coverings– not determine which one is the most reliable in securing against transmission. The research study was not meant to be a definitive guide explaining which masks to use, but rather how to check their varied efficiency.
Science AdvancesA cost-efficient and basic approach for evaluating the efficacy of certain face coverings is believed to be a vital component to advancing the understanding of how SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus accountable for COVID-19, is spread out. To that end, the research study team turned to optical imaging in order to “highlight stark differences in the effectiveness of different masks and mask alternatives” that may help stop the spread of breathing droplets, which are known to consist of SARS-CoV-2 and can transfer during “regular speech.”
In addition, as of mid-2020, there was still much to be identified about the infection pathways of COVID-19, the route of transmission, how to correctly utilize a mask, and how the infection may be impacted by environmental variables.
For the proof-of-concept study, which is implied to inform future research, an individual wearing a mask stood inside of a dark enclosure and spoke into the instructions of a laser beam. Masks checked consisted of a fitted N95 mask both with and without valves, surgical masks, different variations of polyester or cotton masks, as well as a bandanna, and neck fleece, or gaiter.
In other words, the research study findings concluded that the laser-beam method for viewing, recording, and counting breathing beads from evaluated face coverings is a easy and fast way to check their effectiveness. How well each mask worked was not determined—- that would require further, more specific, evaluation, stricter screening systems, and greater control over variables. Now, other scientists can use this exact same laser-beam method to specifically evaluate for mask effectiveness.

The study was not meant to be a conclusive guide describing which masks to use, but rather how to evaluate their different effectiveness. For the proof-of-concept study, which is indicated to notify future research, a person using a mask stood inside of a dark enclosure and spoke into the instructions of a laser beam. Masks checked consisted of a fitted N95 mask both with and without valves, surgical masks, various variations of polyester or cotton masks, as well as a bandanna, and neck fleece, or gaiter. The research study counted the number of beads transmitted through each mask– a finding that does not always relate to run the risk of. In all, the research study was suggested to notify efforts to improve training on appropriate mask use to determine the security and efficacy of recycling some masks.

A fitted N95 mask was determined to be the most reliable, since just.1% of droplets were sent. A gaiter, on the other hand, was revealed to distribute bigger droplets into smaller sized ones, resulting in a higher droplet count than any other face covering and, indeed, than even foregoing a face mask altogether.
” We noticed that speaking through some masks (especially the neck fleece) seemed to distribute the biggest droplets into a multitude of smaller beads, which discusses the obvious increase in droplet count relative to no mask because case,” wrote the scientists. “Considering that smaller sized particles are airborne longer than big beads (larger beads sink quicker), the use of such a mask might be detrimental.”
Science AdvancesKatherine Ellen Foley, a health and science press reporter at Quartz, pointed out in a Twitter thread that the research study is not without restrictions. For beginners, test subjects were just talking and not sneezing, coughing, or breathing greatly. The study counted the number of beads sent through each mask– a finding that does not necessarily equate to risk. In all, the research was implied to inform efforts to enhance training on proper mask use to figure out the safety and effectiveness of recycling some masks.
” This was just a presentation– more work is needed to examine variations in masks, speakers, and how people wear them– but it demonstrates that this sort of test might easily be conducted by businesses and others that are supplying masks to their workers or clients,” stated research study author Martin Fischer, Ph.D., a chemist and physicist and director of the Advanced Light Imaging and Spectroscopy facility, in a Duke University press release.
Then there is the argument regarding mask material. The scientists only checked gaiters made from fleece. Nevertheless, various fabrics or products– like polyester or cotton– could affect how efficient a gaiter is in minimizing transmission.
Outside specialists contended headlines misrepresented the findings by stating that its much better to wear no mask than a neck gaiter. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises that individuals use masks in public settings and when around individuals beyond their household, pointing out evidence that masks work in minimizing the transmission of COVID-19 and spray of droplets when worn over the nose and mouth.
” If everybody used a mask, we could block to 99% of these beads before they reach another person,” said Duke University doctor Eric Westman. “In the absence of a vaccine or antiviral medication, its the one tested way to protect others along with yourself.”

As governments combat the COVID-19 pandemic, Snopes is battling an “infodemic” of rumors and false information, and you can help. Become a Founding Member to assist us employ more fact-checkers.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here